Grief from COVID-19 impact may trigger secondary health and mental health crisisPosted on April 13, 2020
UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. — The loss of life caused by the novel coronavirus pandemic may just be the first tragic wave to hit the country, according to researchers. Grief from the deaths of close relatives and a sudden loss of support could create serious health, mental health and economic issues for grieving family members, they said.
In a study, researchers said that victims of the virus will likely leave behind a large number of grieving children and grandchildren. While the eventual number of bereaved family members will depend on the final tally of casualties, the researchers said that for each casualty there will be many more people who will suffer grief, anxiety and depression. That number, then, could be in the hundreds of thousands, or even millions.
The researchers estimate that there would be 2.2 children bereaved and 4.1 grandchildren bereaved for each person who dies. As an example, if, based on some current estimates, 200,000 Americans would succumb to the virus, about 820,000 grandchildren would be classified as bereaved.
The researchers added that these numbers are moderately sensitive to how wide the infection spreads in the population because eventually people would start losing more than one relative, which would make the multipliers go down.
“We were not intending to project a specific number of people dying from coronavirus, but offer more of a multiple to estimate that figure — given a number of people who died, what would that translate into some downstream effects,” said Ashton Verdery, assistant professor of sociology, demography and social data analytics, and an affiliate of the Population Research Institute and Institute for Computational and Data Sciences, Penn State. “But, for every death that’s projected, we have to remember that this death will not solely be experienced by the individual who is lost, but all the people who will feel it. In this case, it means all the people who will feel grief because they lost parents and grandparents, and other relatives, to the disease.”
The sudden loss of a loved one may make the struggle to deal with the death even harder for people, said Verdery.
“Grieving is a human experience and losing relatives is a painful process, but there is evidence that suggests that experiencing the sudden and rapid loss of a loved one is even more detrimental,” he added.
An inability to properly memorialize victims could be another tragic outcome of the pandemic and one that might impact the level of grief for people, said Verdery. Because funerals decrease social distance and may increase the chance of disease spread, family members may not either get a chance to be by the loved one when he or she passes away, or to conduct a service after the family member dies. This could make the grieving process even harder for some families.
The researchers, who released their findings in a special edition of Applied Demography, hope that raising awareness on the ramifications of this wave of grief could help give both individuals, as well as companies and organizations, a chance to prepare, said Verdery, who worked with Emily Smith-Greenaway, associate professor of sociology, University of Southern California.
“One suggestion I would make is for employers to be ready to examine their bereavement leave policies,” said Verdery. “Employers should also be aware that there will be many workplaces where employees are going to be grieving the loss of a spouse or a close relative.”
Loss of support
Beyond health and mental health issues, the pandemic may have other, often hidden, consequences. Those consequences are the focus of current work, added Verdery.
“One of the things we’re working on now is all of the caregiving and social support components that are missing when an older loved one dies,” he said.
People rely on family members for financial and social support, for example.
“Losing a grandmother that helps with childcare, for example, is really consequential for some families,” said Verdery. “There are many different financial and social types of exchanges that can seriously affect people, as well.”
To conduct the study, the researchers relied on past work that examined family structures in the United States. The researchers used data drawn from several sources to create demographic microsimulation of the kinship networks of white and black Americans. They then created estimated death rates from novel coronavirus based on current death rates by age in places that were hit earlier by the disease, such as Italy and China.
“We wanted to examine this at a broader population level in the face of unprecedented trauma the country is experiencing,” said Verdery. “We needed to know how the virus was operating and then look at how people are linked together through different family relations.”
In the future, the researchers plan to examine the possibility that certain socioeconomic classes and racial groups may be at particular risk for these post-COVID-19 impacts.
“Preliminary figures suggest there’s a real racial stratification of percentages of deaths, for example, the Black community may be particularly hard hit by the disease,” said Verdery. “This may suggest that there will be an undue burden especially on groups that rely on family members at a higher rate for things like childcare. In many of these groups, it’s families that help make ends meet.”
- ‘AI will see you now’: Panel to discuss the AI revolution in health and medicine
- Teams’ technology tools may give researchers a boost in quest to stop COVID-19
- Interactive media reduce negative reactions to health messages, boost compliance
- Game theory shows why stigmatization may not make sense in modern society